<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Write Angles &#187; approaching revision</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elizabethstark.com/tag/approaching-revision/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elizabethstark.com</link>
	<description>Elizabeth Stark&#039;s Storytelling World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 05:39:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Post-critique Method: How to Turn a Conversation About Your Manuscript into a Productive Revision of Your Book</title>
		<link>http://elizabethstark.com/2010/02/08/post-critique-method-how-to-turn-a-conversation-about-your-manuscript-into-a-productive-revision-of-your-book/</link>
		<comments>http://elizabethstark.com/2010/02/08/post-critique-method-how-to-turn-a-conversation-about-your-manuscript-into-a-productive-revision-of-your-book/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 22:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Main]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Revision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[approaching revision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[critique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manuscript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[readers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revision]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elizabethstark.com/?p=1519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What do you do when the manuscripts have come back, your readers' handwriting scrawled in the margins of perhaps 250 pages? What do you do next? CLICK HERE for MORE.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://elizabethstark.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/stackofmss.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1521" title="stackofmss" src="http://elizabethstark.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/stackofmss.jpg" alt="stackofmss" width="350" height="467" /></a>A member of what will shortly blossom into the full-fledged Book Writing World&#8211;my online community, craft and coaching site for writers of books&#8211;had more than a dozen people read her manuscript, writing comments in the margins. <strong>Now what? she wondered, looking at this stack of xeroxed books.</strong></p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p>First, I told her, open all the manuscripts to page one. Look at anything any one said on page one, and consolidate what is relevant and useful into one book. <strong>Go along, page by page, until you&#8217;ve reviewed and condensed the whole conversation onto one manuscript.</strong></p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p>(On a practical level, this means that you go through each manuscript until you come to the first page that has a comment, and then you let it sit on your bed or floor or wherever you&#8217;ve spread everything out, until you get to that page in your review.)</p>
<p>She found it helpful to have this systematic approach, but then she&#8217;d finished going through all the pages of all the manuscripts. Now what?</p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><strong><em>So, what now that you have these comments transcribed? </em></strong></p>
<p>1) Look through them and <strong>make a list of any structural or BIG issue comments </strong>that resonate with you but which will need to be addressed on a macro level. <br />
 2) These macro issues will take daydreaming, re-plotting, conversations with your character, ripping seams and pulling out nails. <strong>Re-visioning. Give them time.</strong> Ask yourself questions and let the answers percolate. Draw diagrams, read books, muse.<br />
 2) The rest of the comments will be easier: page by page, line by line you look at the comments. <strong>If you agree something needs to change, change it. </strong><br />
 <strong>3) You have to go back to &#8220;first draft&#8221; writing mode in order to try something out.</strong> There&#8217;s no way to write something for the first time that isn&#8217;t, at some level, a first draft. Sounds obvious, but it&#8217;s hard to put first draft material in the middle of a manuscript you&#8217;ve been laboring over. There is, however, no other way. <strong>You have to experiment, see what works, be willing to get it wrong. </strong><br />
 4) Once you think you have something that might work, <strong>go on page by page</strong> to the next site-specific comment or comments and address those. <br />
 <strong>5) Keep in constant communication with yourself. </strong>Do not fix what does not, to your way of seeing, need fixing. Do not assume that other people&#8217;s suggestions will be the right ones to fix a problem. Identify the problem underlying the suggestion and <strong>see what your own storyteller has to say about solutions.</strong></p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><strong>I hope this helps others who are wondering how to move forward after a critique! How do you integrate feedback?<br />
 </strong></p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elizabethstark.com/2010/02/08/post-critique-method-how-to-turn-a-conversation-about-your-manuscript-into-a-productive-revision-of-your-book/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

